[Vm-dev] Cog FreeBSD patches

[Igor Stasenko]

On 22 March 2011 23:24, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at angband.za.org> wrote:
>
> On 2011/03/22 22:15, David Graham wrote:
>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank>     I have a (jail on a) FreeBSD 7.3 machine, if we need a
>>>>>> Hudson
>>>>>> slave.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Frank>     Can slaves run behind a NAT?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I recently gave a slave a 127.1/16 address on my box, and then used pf
>>>>>> BINAT to allow selective inward/outward connections to a secondary
>>>>>> public IP I had.  Worked pretty well.
>>>>>
>>>>> I was thinking primarily of my laptop, which I'm happy to have as a
>>>>> slave.
>>>>> It's not always online, and it's always behind some NAT or other, so I
>>>>> wondered whether it'd be suitable as a hudson slave.
>>>>>
>>>>> But my FreeBSD jail has a public IP so I just need to be told how to
>>>>> set it
>>>>> up!
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> create a user named hudson
>>>> and put the attached file to its .ssh dir
>>>> (in attachment)
>>>>
>>>> (and probably you have to enable sshd options somewhere to use
>>>> authorized_keys file(s) if its not on by default)
>>>>
>>>> You also need a working java there.
>>>> And give your IP :)
>>>
>>> OK, the account's set up, and I have a java 1.6 installed.
>>>
>>> You also have my IP, in another mail :)
>>>
>>> frank
>>
>>
>> We probably don't need two freebsd build servers, but I now have a
>> dedicated host available if you guys are still interested?
>
> David, I offered because I thought you were running 8, and it'd be useful
> verifying things on both a 7.x and 8.x machine. (Also, for extra kinks/kicks
> my box is an amd64, so that might help push the envelope further.)
>
> But even if you're also running a 7.3 amd64, a bit of redundancy won't hurt.
>

Yep. No problem.. we could use both slaves for SETI program (in case of need ;)

> frank
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.