[Vm-dev] Processor association in special objects array

Igor Stasenko siguctua at gmail.com
Wed May 30 17:25:51 UTC 2012


On 30 May 2012 18:42, Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:32 PM, Nicolas Cellier <nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Doesn't it enable creation of a new Processor ?
>
>
> Maybe (not sure about this), but why does this design decision apply for this object only?

Because! :)
Hell i know why.. a proper answer would probably be that different
parts are done at different time
by different people without good communication &/ striving for unified
interfaces.

> Because for other objects I have to recreate the complete array :/.
>
>>
>>
>> Nicolas
>>
>> 2012/5/30 Guillermo Polito <guillermopolito at gmail.com>:
>> >
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > With Ben we were wandering the reason why the special objects array points to the association #Processor->Processor, and not directly to the Processor object.
>> >
>> > TIA,
>> > Guille & Ben
>> >
>
>
>



-- 
Best regards,
Igor Stasenko.


More information about the Vm-dev mailing list