[Vm-dev] Prebuilt 64-bit VM on Linux?

[phil at highoctane.be]

Current Pharo is 6505


2013/4/11 Igor Stasenko <siguctua at gmail.com>

>
> On 11 April 2013 01:12, David T. Lewis <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 03:06:41PM -0700, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10.04.2013, at 14:57, "David T. Lewis" <lewis at mail.msen.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 06:11:53PM -0300, Hern??n Morales Durand
> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> I have a 64-bit CentOS server and I want a to measure the peak
> memory usage
> >> >> with valgrind for a script. For that I need a 64-VM (with a 32-bit
> Pharo
> >> >> image).
> >> >> I have tried with
> >> >>
> http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2714/coglinux-13.13.2714.tgzbut
> >> >> file reports: "squeak: ELF 32-bit LSB executable, Intel 80386,
> version
> >> >> 1 (SYSV), dynamically linked (uses shared libs), for GNU/Linux
> 2.6.9, not
> >> >> stripped"
> >> >>
> >> >> Is there any precompiled linux 64-bit binary available?
> >> >
> >> > As others have pointed out, an interpreter VM compiled for 64-bit will
> >> > work fine, though not as fast as Cog. However, recent Pharo images
> will
> >> > no longer run on a standard interpreter, so you cannot run a Pharo 2.0
> >> > image on a 64-bit VM.
> >>
> >>
> >> Really? What did change in Pharo to make it incompatible?
> >>
> >
> > I don't know. I've asked a couple of times ...
> >
> i think it is about image format, since Pharo adopted one, introduced by
> Eliot
> (6505 or 6504 .. don't remember one) .
> And squeak VM does not supports that format.. but if i remember it was
> changed lately
> and you added pieces to be able to read new format..
> If that's true, then i don't see other reasons why it shouldn't work.
>
> > Dave
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Igor Stasenko.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20130411/1a8b1ef2/attachment-0001.htm