[Vm-dev] VM Maker: VMMaker.oscog-eem.276.mcz

[Eliot Miranda]

Hi Frank,

On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On 21 March 2013 23:44,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
> >
> > Eliot Miranda uploaded a new version of VMMaker to project VM Maker:
> > http://source.squeak.org/VMMaker/VMMaker.oscog-eem.276.mcz
> >
> > ==================== Summary ====================
> >
> > Name: VMMaker.oscog-eem.276
> > Author: eem
> > Time: 21 March 2013, 4:43:39.056 pm
> > UUID: 52d03a8f-11ec-4454-9c4a-ea1c383f339a
> > Ancestors: VMMaker.oscog-eem.275
> >
> > Cogit:
> > Stop reporting EncounteredUnknownBytecode with an error message.
> >
> > Fix slip in ceSICMiss: that didn't link new PIC if an MNU case.
> >
> > Better document the calling conventions.
> >
> > Add an assert to genGetImplicitReceiverFor:forPush: that checks
> > the appropriate use of the IsNSSend annotation.
> >
> > Fix simulation bug in CogMethodSurrogate>>nextOpenPIC.
> >
> > Slang:
> > Nuke unused InterpreterSimulationObject.
> >
> > =============== Diff against VMMaker.oscog-eem.275 ===============
>
> I realise I've just reported a Cog build failure, but when might we
> see the unusedBytecode stuff land in a released VM? I'd love to play
> with MethodMassage, without having to custom build a Cog. (Although I
> suspect I could do just that for the moment...)
>
> frank
>

I think the latest version on the site, r2714, does support this.  See
http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2714/ChangeHistory, or am I
confused?

-- 
best,
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20130521/15650995/attachment.htm