[Vm-dev] VM Maker: VMMaker.oscog-eem.276.mcz

[Eliot Miranda]

On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 3:27 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi Frank,
>
>
> On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 3:34 PM, Frank Shearar <frank.shearar at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> On 21 March 2013 23:44,  <commits at source.squeak.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Eliot Miranda uploaded a new version of VMMaker to project VM Maker:
>> > http://source.squeak.org/VMMaker/VMMaker.oscog-eem.276.mcz
>> >
>> > ==================== Summary ====================
>> >
>> > Name: VMMaker.oscog-eem.276
>> > Author: eem
>> > Time: 21 March 2013, 4:43:39.056 pm
>> > UUID: 52d03a8f-11ec-4454-9c4a-ea1c383f339a
>> > Ancestors: VMMaker.oscog-eem.275
>> >
>> > Cogit:
>> > Stop reporting EncounteredUnknownBytecode with an error message.
>> >
>> > Fix slip in ceSICMiss: that didn't link new PIC if an MNU case.
>> >
>> > Better document the calling conventions.
>> >
>> > Add an assert to genGetImplicitReceiverFor:forPush: that checks
>> > the appropriate use of the IsNSSend annotation.
>> >
>> > Fix simulation bug in CogMethodSurrogate>>nextOpenPIC.
>> >
>> > Slang:
>> > Nuke unused InterpreterSimulationObject.
>> >
>> > =============== Diff against VMMaker.oscog-eem.275 ===============
>>
>> I realise I've just reported a Cog build failure, but when might we
>> see the unusedBytecode stuff land in a released VM? I'd love to play
>> with MethodMassage, without having to custom build a Cog. (Although I
>> suspect I could do just that for the moment...)
>>
>> frank
>>
>
> I think the latest version on the site, r2714, does support this.  See
> http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2714/ChangeHistory, or am I
> confused?


Uh, I'm confused ;)  I'll try and do an up-to-date build before the end of
the week.
-- 
doh!
Eliot
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20130521/265249cd/attachment.htm