[Vm-dev] [Squeak 0007821]: Make generated interpreter code
compatible with Plan9's POSIX C compiler
David T. Lewis
lewis at mail.msen.com
Thu Oct 2 23:43:32 UTC 2014
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 12:36:06PM -0400, Alex Franchuk wrote:
>
> On 10/02/2014 10:44 AM, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >On 02.10.2014, at 16:05, Alex Franchuk <alex.franchuk at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>The changes were:
> >>1. Fix a couple incorrect/faulty C type declarations for certain methods
> >>and scoped variables within the methods.
> >>2. Ensure functions which declare a return type will return some value at
> >>the end of the block (defaulting to null).
> >>3. Ensure assignments are properly casted when type data about the
> >>expression and variable is available.
> >>4. Ensure functions arguments are properly casted when type data about
> >>the function's parameters and the argument expressions is available.
> >That sounds rather useful. I need better type information, too.
> >
> >E.g., I'd like to know that firstIndexableField() is really an 'unsigned
> >char *' here, not a 'void *' as declared:
> >
> >unsafeByteOf: bytesOop at: ix
> > "Argument bytesOop must not be aSmallInteger!"
> > <inline: true>
> > | pointer |
> > <var: #pointer type: #'unsigned char *'>
> > ^(pointer := interpreterProxy firstIndexableField: bytesOop) at: ix
> > - 1
> >
> >I thought I could use the scopeStack but that appears to not be available
> >when generating code ...
> >
> >- Bert -
> >
> Right now the type data is only obtained by using the typeOfVariable
> method of the CCodeGeneration instance, or the arguments property of the
> TMethod instance, and unfortunately these return both the type and the
> name of variable, as if it were a declaration, so my code tries to get
> the type from this (it may not always work).
>
> Ideally typeOfVariable would return only the type, and perhaps a new
> method like declarationOfVariable would return what typeOfVariable
> currently returns. That would be more reliable, and scoped variables
> could perhaps be tracked through the CCodeGeneration instance.
One related suggestion: In TSendNode>>emitCCodeAsFunctionCallOn:level:generator:
the declToType block might better be implemented as a separate method to
make it easier to see what the code generator is trying to do. It might
look like this:
TSendNode>>variableDeclarationToCType: declarationString
"Answer a C type string corresponding to the C variable declared in declarationString"
| strs ind |
declarationString isNil ifFalse: [
strs := declarationString subStrings: ' '.
ind := 0.
strs size > 1
ifTrue:
["Bit of a hack to get 'type *'"
[(strs second at: (ind+1)) isSpecial] whileTrue: [ ind := ind + 1 ].
^ strs first, (strs second copyFrom: 1 to: ind)]
ifFalse:
[ ^strs first ]]
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list