[Vm-dev] Can we invert logic of critical section primitives (186, 187)?

Denis Kudriashov dionisiydk at gmail.com
Mon Jan 11 20:22:33 UTC 2016

Hi Eliot.

2016-01-11 18:00 GMT+01:00 Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com>:

> Hi Denis,
>     I'm sorry but I already moved Squeak trunk over to the new primitives
> (and 3DICC's Terf system has been using them since 2008/2009).  You can
> invert via eg
>     false == self primitiveEnterCriticalSection
> At some future date we could add revised primitives with new primitive
> numbers. But the current primitives are set.  Sorry.

Ok. I can not wait this for now.
So we will integrate my changes into Pharo (I hope)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20160111/937d2017/attachment.htm

More information about the Vm-dev mailing list