[Vm-dev] reorganizing opensmalltalk-vm
tim Rowledge
tim at rowledge.org
Sun Oct 28 19:52:43 UTC 2018
> On 2018-10-28, at 12:37 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> The only thing I'd like to see in Tonel is per-method timestamps a la
>
[snip]
>
> but I know there is active opposition to this idea.
Why on earth is there any opposition to what appears a perfectly reasonable idea? Within, of course, the context of an idea I find rather daft, that of trying to force Smalltalk source code into a model that seems completely at odds.
tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Fractured Idiom:- POSH MORTEM - Death styles of the rich and famous
More information about the Vm-dev
mailing list