[Vm-dev] reorganizing opensmalltalk-vm

tim Rowledge tim at rowledge.org
Sun Oct 28 19:52:43 UTC 2018



> On 2018-10-28, at 12:37 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> wrote:
> 

> 
> The only thing I'd like to see in Tonel is per-method timestamps a la
> 
[snip]
> 
> but I know there is active opposition to this idea.

Why on earth is there any opposition to what appears a perfectly reasonable idea? Within, of course, the context of an idea I find rather daft, that of trying to force Smalltalk source code into a model that seems completely at odds.


tim
--
tim Rowledge; tim at rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim
Fractured Idiom:- POSH MORTEM - Death styles of the rich and famous




More information about the Vm-dev mailing list