[Vm-dev] CI status

[Nicolas Cellier]

Le lun. 26 oct. 2020 à 15:11, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda at gmail.com> a
écrit :

>
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> On Oct 26, 2020, at 6:59 AM, Nicolas Cellier <
> nicolas.cellier.aka.nice at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> 
> Hi all,
> I have restored (I think) the green status of minheadless build.
>
>
> Thank you so much!
>
> We could eventually authorize failure of all those builds, or restrict the
> number of flavours that we build (it takes really loooong time before we
> get CI feedback).
> But if we abandon all those now, I fear that we never catch up; it's a one
> way ticket. IMO there are still interesting ideas to take, even if
> development has continued in Pharo fork...
>
>
> One approach might be to split them into “essential” and “nice to have” so
> we get faster feedback from the “essential” set.
>
> +1, but I do not know how to configure the CI like that...

> Now the next failing build on travis is about squeak.cog.v3. Did some
> incompatible VM change took place?
>
> For example
> https://travis-ci.org/github/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/jobs/738831149
>
> ######################################################
>
> # Squeak-4.6 on Travis CI (2278.23)                  #
>
> # 3401 Tests with 5 Failures and 0 Errors in 112.13s #
>
> ######################################################
>
> #########################
>
> # 5 tests did not pass: #
>
> #########################
>
> SUnitToolBuilderTests
> 837fef_266b
>
>  ✗ #testHandlingNotification (10023ms)
>
> TestValueWithinFix
> 2a65cb_266b
>
>  ✗ #testValueWithinTimingBasic (1005ms)
> e9a7ab_266b
>
>  ✗ #testValueWithinTimingNestedInner (1001ms)
> c57415_266b
>
>  ✗ #testValueWithinTimingNestedOuter (1002ms)
> e89da3_266b
>
>  ✗ #testValueWithinTimingRepeat (3004ms)
>
>   Executed 3401 Tests with 5 Failures and 0 Errors in 112.13s.
>
> To reproduce the failed build locally, download smalltalkCI, and try to run something like:
>
> 	bin/smalltalkci -s Squeak-4.6 --headfull /path/to/.smalltalk.ston
>
> Could these test failures be nothing to do with the VM but instead to do
> with the (growing) divergence between trunk/spur and Squeak 4.6?
>
> _,,,^..^,,,_ (phone)
>
No idea...
I've downloaded a Squeak4.6-15102.image, compiled a squeak.cog.v3 on
windows10, and the test pass...
I will retry on other OSes this evening (the test fails on linux...).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20201026/20df1e32/attachment-0001.html>