[Vm-dev] [OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm] primitiveSSLCreate fails sporadically on Windows (#554)

[Christoph Thiede]

> can you do `dumpbin /exports` on the DLL?

202010232046:
<details><pre><code>
        0.00 version
           1 ordinal base
          12 number of functions
          12 number of names

    ordinal hint RVA      name

         12    0 000013A0 getModuleName
          2    1 000013B0 primitiveAccept = printf
          3    2 000014F0 primitiveConnect
          4    3 00001630 primitiveCreate
          5    4 00001680 primitiveDecrypt
          6    5 000017C0 primitiveDestroy
          7    6 00001820 primitiveEncrypt
          8    7 00001960 primitiveGetIntProperty
          9    8 000019F0 primitiveGetStringProperty
         10    9 00001B40 primitiveSetIntProperty
         11    A 00001BE0 primitiveSetStringProperty
          1    B 00001CA0 setInterpreter

  Summary

        1000 .CRT
        1000 .bss
        1000 .data
        4000 .debug_abbrev
        1000 .debug_aranges
        2000 .debug_frame
       44000 .debug_info
        9000 .debug_line
       13000 .debug_loc
        1000 .debug_macinfo
        1000 .debug_ranges
        3000 .debug_str
        1000 .edata
        1000 .idata
        1000 .pdata
        2000 .rdata
        1000 .reloc
        1000 .rsrc
        9000 .text
        1000 .tls
        1000 .xdata
</code></pre></details>

202003021730:
<details><pre><code>
File Type: DLL

  Section contains the following exports for SqueakSSL.dll

    00000000 characteristics
    5E5E1711 time date stamp Tue Mar  3 09:36:33 2020
        0.00 version
           1 ordinal base
          12 number of functions
          12 number of names

    ordinal hint RVA      name

         12    0 000013B0 getModuleName
          2    1 000013C0 primitiveAccept = sqSetupCert
          3    2 00001500 primitiveConnect
          4    3 00001640 primitiveCreate
          5    4 00001690 primitiveDecrypt
          6    5 000017D0 primitiveDestroy
          7    6 00001830 primitiveEncrypt
          8    7 00001970 primitiveGetIntProperty
          9    8 00001A00 primitiveGetStringProperty
         10    9 00001B50 primitiveSetIntProperty
         11    A 00001BF0 primitiveSetStringProperty
          1    B 00001CB0 setInterpreter

  Summary

        1000 .CRT
        1000 .bss
        1000 .data
        3000 .debug_abbrev
        1000 .debug_aranges
        1000 .debug_frame
       39000 .debug_info
        4000 .debug_line
        6000 .debug_loc
        1000 .debug_macinfo
        1000 .debug_ranges
        3000 .debug_str
        1000 .edata
        1000 .idata
        1000 .pdata
        1000 .rdata
        1000 .reloc
        1000 .rsrc
        4000 .text
        1000 .tls
        1000 .xdata
</code></pre></details>

> Also, do you get such a backtrace when you invoke the method of UUID that contains `primitiveMakeUUID`?

In the 202010232046 VM, `UUID new` does not raise an error but returns a plausible result. In the 202003021730 VM, another `LoadLibrary` warning appears in the console but the expressions answers a plausible result, too. The trace is:

```
0xC0000005: Access violation when writing at position 0xFFFFFFFF9DAC75EC.

ntdll.dll!LdrpAllocateTlsEntry()
ntdll.dll!LdrpHandleTlsData()
ntdll.dll!LdrpDoPostSnapWork()
ntdll.dll!LdrpSnapModule()
ntdll.dll!LdrpMapAndSnapDependency()
ntdll.dll!LdrpMapDllWithSectionHandle()
ntdll.dll!LdrpMapDllNtFileName()
ntdll.dll!LdrpMapDllRetry()
ntdll.dll!LdrpProcessWork()
ntdll.dll!LdrpDrainWorkQueue()
ntdll.dll!LdrpLoadDllInternal()
ntdll.dll!LdrpLoadDll()
ntdll.dll!LdrLoadDll()
KernelBase.dll!LoadLibraryExW()
KernelBase.dll!LoadLibraryExA()
KernelBase.dll!LoadLibraryA()
Squeak.exe!00000000004aa129()
Squeak.exe!00000000004b8cd7()
Squeak.exe!00000000004b9062()
Squeak.exe!000000000041c642()
Squeak.exe!0000000000407926()
Squeak.exe!0000000000411c9e()
Squeak.exe!0000000000401d3c()
Squeak.exe!00000000004aea6b()
Squeak.exe!00000000004aed8f()
Squeak.exe!00000000004013c7()
Squeak.exe!00000000004014cb()
kernel32.dll!BaseThreadInitThunk()
ntdll.dll!RtlUserThreadStart()
```

So yes, the stack appears to be indentical.

-- 
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSmalltalk/opensmalltalk-vm/issues/554#issuecomment-799488434
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/attachments/20210315/ec15d982/attachment.html>