Hi Ian,<div><br></div><div>Please, can you tell me</div><div>- which gcc version you use</div><div>- which CFLAGS option for configure script</div><div><br></div><div>tinyBenchmarks are better with you binaries than mine. I try to learn on this.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Cheers,</div><div><br clear="all">Laurent Laffont<br>
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Ian Piumarta <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:piumarta@speakeasy.net">piumarta@speakeasy.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Dear Linux hackers,<br>
<br>
Does anyone have experience with making binary releases for 32-bit Linux that are compiled on a 64-bit system with -m32? My Linux development machine runs 64-bit Linux and it would be convenient to package 32-bit Linux VM binaries on that machine rather than remotely, or worse after rebooting into a 32-bit kernel. Any information or opinions, for or against, would be gratefully received!<br>
<br>
If anyone wants to play spot-the-difference:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.0.2.2181-linux_i386-1.tar.gz" target="_blank">http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.0.2.2181-linux_i386-1.tar.gz</a><br>
<a href="http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.0.2.2181-linux_i386-2.tar.gz" target="_blank">http://squeakvm.org/unix/release/Squeak-4.0.2.2181-linux_i386-2.tar.gz</a><br>
<br>
One of these was compiled on a 32-bit system, the other on a 64-bit system. (I already know they have slightly different collections of plugins. :) My 32-bit machine happily runs either.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br><font color="#888888">
Ian<br>
<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>