<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 4:03 AM, keith <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk">keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Bazaar is better than mercurial, one of the launchpad team is a squeaker.<br>
<br>
Launchpad is better than github.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I have never used bazaar, but Launchpad looks great. <a href="https://launchpad.net/+tour/index">https://launchpad.net/+tour/index</a></div><div><br></div>
<div>Ubuntu integration + translation + API are worthwhile</div><div><br></div><div>Laurent</div><div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<font color="#888888">
<br>
Keith</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
On 25 Jun 2010, at 02:26, Josh Gargus wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On Jun 24, 2010, at 5:17 PM, Igor Stasenko wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Does Mercurial provides an infrastructure like github?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Google Code hosting supports Mercurial. I'm not sure specifically what infrastructure you're talking about; does Google Code meet your needs?<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I mean, if it doesn't , then it is nothing better than svn (the fact<br>
that i could have a full copy<br>
of repository locally doesn't much matters).<br>
I really don't care what version control system used as a backend, i<br>
care about infrastructure around it.<br>
On a github its ultimately easy to get started and make own fork(s) of<br>
existing projects,<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Not sure how well Google Code meets that need. Anyone?<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Josh<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
and moreover, all such things are tracked, not just sources.<br>
So, users could see how much forks there, and could navigate through<br>
them etc etc.<br>
The fancy & clever diff/merge etc things is cool, but used seldom,<br>
because 99% of times you just doing<br>
edit/commit.<br>
<br>
On 25 June 2010 02:46, Josh Gargus <<a href="mailto:josh@schwa.ca" target="_blank">josh@schwa.ca</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
+1 Mercurial, -1 Git.<br>
Cheers,<br>
Josh<br>
<br>
<br>
On Jun 24, 2010, at 3:43 PM, Eliot Miranda wrote:<br>
<br>
<br>
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Igor Stasenko <<a href="mailto:siguctua@gmail.com" target="_blank">siguctua@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Eliot, how about using github for it?<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think that's great for the whole Squeak VM not just Cog. I'm not doing this now because I think Cog should live with the rest of the Squeak VM. Let's start a separate discussion on whether we should move <a href="http://squeakvm.org/svn/squeak" target="_blank">http://squeakvm.org/svn/squeak</a> to github, or at least to git with a home on machines we control..<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
It would be much convenient for use, since it supports branching and<br>
no need for someone to be added to 'official' list of contributors in<br>
order to push own<br>
patches.<br>
Anyone could make own fork at any time, and at any time, a core<br>
developer could backport the changes<br>
into official repository.<br>
I think github model is very good for community development. Then i,<br>
for instance, could<br>
push my own changes into my branch, and it will be easy to track,<br>
exchange and port the code between<br>
forks and official repository.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
Agreed. Git and/or Mercurial is much better than svn.<br>
best<br>
Eliot<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On 23 June 2010 21:48, Eliot Miranda <<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com" target="_blank">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Hi All,<br>
I need to be able to push fixes to Cog into general circulation and for this I'd like to maintain a Cog branch in the Subversion tree. But how do I get permission and/or credentials? What's the process to add me to those allowed to write to the repository? Or is there simply a secret username and password that's told to a few? If the later can some kind soul let me have the password. I faithfully promise not to abuse the privilege.<br>
best<br>
Eliot<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Best regards,<br>
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Best regards,<br>
Igor Stasenko AKA sig.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>