<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Eliot Miranda <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 7:01 AM, Mariano Martinez Peck <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:marianopeck@gmail.com" target="_blank">marianopeck@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>Co is for co-exist ? and not for cog ?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Because it coexists with the JIT. Actually it's a co-dependency relationship; the JIT and it's generated code can't do without the CoInterpreter.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br>Ok...thanks for the clarification<br> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote">
<div><br></div><div>b.</div><div>e.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><br>thanks<br><br>mariano<br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>