<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Nikolay Suslov <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nsuslovi@gmail.com">nsuslovi@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 9:20 PM, Eliot Miranda <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com" target="_blank">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>Including <a href="http://www.mirandabanda.org/files/Cog/VM/VM.r2346/" target="_blank">VM.r2346/</a>? Can you send me some reproducible case for at least the FFI one? Are you sure you're using the SqueakFFIPrims included with the VM? Please /don't/ use the FFI plugin from the standard VMs.</div>
</div></blockquote><div><br> <br>Yes, using the FFIPrims from the old Cog VMs (<2339) works just fine with the latest VMs (2346).<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>What's the case to test?</div><div>
</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote"><div>But, is that Ok?<br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Well, it is evidently better than cog + new ffi, which mystifies me. Hence the request for a reproducible case. Remember to state OS and version, directory, etc, etc. Don't spare the details.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br>Thanks,<br>Nikolay<br></div></div>
<br></blockquote></div><br>