<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Mar 20, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Tobias Pape <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Das.Linux@gmx.de">Das.Linux@gmx.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
Am 2011-03-20 um 19:09 schrieb Eliot Miranda:<br>
<div class="im"><br>
> -------<br>
> Name: VMMaker-oscog.52<br>
> Author: IgorStasenko<br>
> Time: 18 March 2011, 12:45:14 am<br>
> UUID: a2810aac-4423-6740-b70e-7e821b979cb4<br>
> Ancestors: VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.50,<br>
> VMMaker-oscog-EstebanLorenzano.50, VMMaker-oscog.51<br>
><br>
> Merge with oscog-49-51 & Esteban-50<br>
> -------<br>
><br>
> I feel like you continuously ignoring my requests to merge the code<br>
> base.. and work together on merged instance<br>
> of VMMaker.<br>
> If you don't like this code, just say it. But don't ignore.<br>
><br>
> Its not intentional. It's simply a matter of finding time to do the merge. Mariano posted a bug. I fixed just that bug and published. I'm not dissing you. I have very limited time.<br>
><br>
<br>
</div>Hmm, wouldn't applying the “default” naming scheme prevent such overwrites?<br>
<br>
That is, now there would be<br>
VMMaker-oscog-eem.52<br>
for Elliots version and<br>
VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.52<br>
for Igors version.<br>
What would prevent us from that?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I don't see a naming conflict. I've been using VMMaker-oscog.NN since the beginning and Igor has been using VMMaker-oscog-IgorStasenko.NN. This isn't about names, it's about content. Igor is miffed I didn't merge in some changes he made when I published VMMaker-oscog.52, right Igor?</div>
<div><br></div><div>best</div><div>Eliot</div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
So Long,<br>
<font color="#888888"> -Tobias</font></blockquote></div><br>