<div dir="ltr">Hi Chris,<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Chris Muller <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:asqueaker@gmail.com" target="_blank">asqueaker@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
Hi Eliot, I just wanted to confirm whether these changes are intended<br>
to address crashing issues of the new 2673 VM. </blockquote><div><br></div><div>As David says, no, these are reiterations of changes I made for the 2638 VM.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I was happy to read<br>
your release notes of 2673 because they seem to indicate you're aware<br>
of an issue I experience related to use of bulk becomeForward: -- as<br>
if not all are getting becomed. However I went back to 2672 for now<br>
because 2673 crashes very quickly during OSProcess activity.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>That's very good to know. That means that my recent changes have caused a regression. I finally implemented setting the stack page size and per-page stack limit in a sane way, but your crashes show I still have the dimensions wrong. If I may I'd like to use you as a guinea pig since you can reproduce the linux crashes very quickly. But it'll take a little while to construct the code I need to measure precisely how much stack space is used. For now using 2672 should be OK provided your bulk becomes don't create huge numbers of new roots. This is something that tends to happen a lot in Newspeak, where classes are often new objects, but not so much in Squeak.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
Thanks.<br>
<br>
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 1:23 PM,<br>
<<a href="mailto:squeak-dev-noreply@lists.squeakfoundation.org">squeak-dev-noreply@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> Eliot Miranda uploaded a new version of VMConstruction-Plugins-OSProcessPlugin to project OSProcessPlugin:<br>
> <a href="http://www.squeaksource.com/OSProcessPlugin/VMConstruction-Plugins-OSProcessPlugin.oscog-eem.41.mcz" target="_blank">http://www.squeaksource.com/OSProcessPlugin/VMConstruction-Plugins-OSProcessPlugin.oscog-eem.41.mcz</a><br>
><br>
> ==================== Summary ====================<br>
><br>
> Name: VMConstruction-Plugins-OSProcessPlugin.oscog-eem.41<br>
> Author: eem<br>
> Time: 14 December 2012, 4:42:40 am<br>
> UUID: 0406d3fc-7b8b-4b72-b20a-f254eeb1b893<br>
> Ancestors: VMConstruction-Plugins-OSProcessPlugin.oscog-eem.40<br>
><br>
> Check for needing sigaltstack properly in setSignalNumber:handler:<br>
><br>
</blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>best,<div>Eliot</div>
</div></div>