<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 2:14 PM, Igor Stasenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:siguctua@gmail.com" target="_blank">siguctua@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im"><br>
On 12 April 2013 17:43, Eliot Miranda <<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> Then I would either move to VMMaker or be prepared for a fair bit of work. I haven't worked on the Interpreter in the Cog branch for many years.<br>
<br>
</div>Then i suggest, what about killing that class in cog branch of VMMaker..<br>
it makes no sense to keep old and unmaintained cruft anyways.. just<br>
another source<br>
of confusion and bloat..<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Trouble is there's good stuff in there like Andreas' profiler support for the interpreter. So there is stiuff that needs to be merged from Interpreter into the main line too. It must stay until the merge and then all of the classes will pair up.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
and later when/if squeak interpreter will be merged with stack one, we<br>
can reintroduce it<br>
by taking it from squeak branch.<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Best regards,<br>
Igor Stasenko.<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br>best,<div>Eliot</div>