<div dir="ltr">As well as the UI tool for plugins and generation (spent a while getting this to show in Pharo but apart from seeing the list of plugins, there is litte value (and Utilities is used in a number of places).<div>
<br></div><div style>Phil, still fighting the StackIntepreter simulation.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2013/4/12 Igor Stasenko <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:siguctua@gmail.com" target="_blank">siguctua@gmail.com</a>></span><br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
On 12 April 2013 17:43, Eliot Miranda <<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
><br>
> Then I would either move to VMMaker or be prepared for a fair bit of work. I haven't worked on the Interpreter in the Cog branch for many years.<br>
<br>
Then i suggest, what about killing that class in cog branch of VMMaker..<br>
it makes no sense to keep old and unmaintained cruft anyways.. just<br>
another source<br>
of confusion and bloat..<br>
<br>
and later when/if squeak interpreter will be merged with stack one, we<br>
can reintroduce it<br>
by taking it from squeak branch.<br>
<span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
--<br>
Best regards,<br>
Igor Stasenko.<br>
<br>
</font></span></blockquote></div><br></div>