<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<font face="Georgia">Just so you are not heading astray, CM210 has
*fewer* bytecodes than CM3931 and *many* of CM210's bytecodes are
also in CM3931, but the former is not a subset of the latter,
either by happenstance or some sort of magic sharing of bytecodes.
They are just similar because they are compiled from similar
source code.<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Bob<br>
<br>
</font>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/14/13 4:29 PM, gettimothy wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:142f303828b.-314795332031519307.-4168358830043045902@zoho.com"
type="cite">2. Misconception 1 happened because I wrongly thought
the 'CompiledMethod I had highlighted was the SAME compiled method
for the method, just displayed differentyl. .They are not--its
obvious now that I know where to look. CompiledMethod(210) in the
BlockContext vs CompiledMethod(3931) in the methodDict of the test
class I was using. CompiledMethod(210) contains a subset of the
bytecodes in CompiledMethod(3931), but its header and number of
literals are different.</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>