<div dir="ltr">Wow, okay made it to a real computer and tried it out. Fabulous. Considering an interpreter running in another high level language, the performance is amazing. I'm floored.<div><br></div><div>Juan: I would LOVE to see MVC for headless servers and systems too low end to run Morphic well. One of the things I'd like to be able to do in Squeak/etc is to be able to unload Morphic. Alas, I have too many hobbies. I wish I had a good chunk of time to devote to resurrecting MVC for Cuis. But I'm rambling off-topic.</div>
<div><br></div><div>This is just SO cool.</div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 8:50 AM, J. Vuletich (mail lists) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:juanlists@jvuletich.org" target="_blank">juanlists@jvuletich.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
This is absolutely beautiful!<br>
<br>
Performance figures are rather modest:<br>
Safari: 3,401,360 bytecode/s 127,111 sends/s<br>
Firefox: 4,232,804 bytecode/s 152,003 sends/s<br>
Chrome: 1,860,465 bytecode/s 76,859 send/s<br>
StackVM: 623,250,152 bytecode/s 13,392,546 sends/s<br>
<br>
But still, MVC is _very_ usable. I could even set display depth to 32bpp, and play with mandalas and such in full color. Wonderful!<br>
<br>
This makes me think... Maybe MVC could still be useful as a low overhead UI for servers that usually run headless, very low power hardware, etc...<br>
<br>
Cheers,<br>
Juan Vuletich<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>