<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 9:45 AM, Bert Freudenberg <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bert@freudenbergs.de" target="_blank">bert@freudenbergs.de</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"> <br>On 15.02.2014, at 08:37, Denis Kudriashov <<a href="mailto:dionisiydk@gmail.com">dionisiydk@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<br>So any object change will be restored after system restart without any special action.<br>
><br>
> What do you think about this?<br>
> Was there smalltalk implementations (any research projects) with such feature? Maybe first smalltalk computer works same way?<br>
<br>
Gemstone/S.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Eh, not really. Gemstone allows multiple virtual machines to operate on the same object memory simultaneously. As a consequence, changes are not persisted automatically; the application has to explicitly commit a transaction to in order to persist changes. That's quite a different model from automatic, transparent persistence as Denis describes.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Colin</div><div><br></div></div></div></div>