<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body ><div style='font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;'>Thanks Tim.<br><br><br><div id="1"><br>---- On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 10:24:07 -0800 <b>tim Rowledge<tim@rowledge.org></b> wrote ---- <br></div><br><blockquote style="border-left: 1px solid #0000FF; padding-left: 6px; margin:0 0 0 5px"><br> <br>On 24-02-2014, at 10:15 AM, gettimothy <<a subj="" mailid="gettimothy%40zoho.com" href="mailto:gettimothy@zoho.com" target="_blank">gettimothy@zoho.com</a>> wrote: <br> <br>> Hi All. <br>> <br>> I noticed that VMMakerTool burps on the oscogvm/platforms file path (on linux) while the scripting approach uses that just fine. (Moving all the subdirectories under osgocvm/ to ./ let's the tool do its thing just fine). <br>> <br>> My hunch is that scripting is the preferred way to build and VMMakerTool is not used for .oscog <br>> <br>> True? <br> <br>IIRC Eliot doesn’t use the UI tool. I did update it a smidge last year to make it work with the way code was layed out then; it probably needs another firkle to deal with the latest tree shape. <br> <br>The VMMakerTool was always just a way to drive the scripting side of the VMMaker anyway. For any sort of automation, scripts are the way to go. <br> <br> <br>tim <br>-- <br>tim Rowledge; <a subj="" mailid="tim%40rowledge.org" href="mailto:tim@rowledge.org" target="_blank">tim@rowledge.org</a>; <a href="http://www.rowledge.org/tim" target="_blank">http://www.rowledge.org/tim</a> <br>After a number of decimal places, nobody gives a damn. <br> <br> <br></blockquote><br></div></body></html>