<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"><html><head><meta content="text/html;charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"></head><body ><div style='font-size:10pt;font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif;'><div>Hi all.</div><div><br></div><div>Unless I am talked out of it , I am going to generate the CMMake "stuff" from Smalltalk classes similar to the way that VMMaker generates source code.</div><div><br></div><div>My reasons are:</div><div> 1. source control is Monticello. (and if you generate the source tree, the pharo folks can use that to pipe into git--so that sorta-kinda-syncs things up a bit)</div><div> 2. modification and maintenance is in Squeak.</div><div> 3. it should be fun.</div><div> 4. Modular (looking at the CMake generators, it just begs for OOP approach)</div><div> 5. Each plugin is responsible for its own CMakeLists.txt (i.e. cmake configuration file)</div><div> ....</div><div><br></div><div>whaddya think?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Also, if you are ok with the idea, what do you want it named? Do you want some classes added to VMMaker or do you want something elsewhere?</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>p.s. I am suffering from a bit of Spring Fever and took the weekend and Monday and most of today off. </div><div>I am still studying CMaker before I even look at the existing project for Interpreter and I will probably not look at the existing Interpreter CMake project until I go through</div><div>the exercise of writing my own from scratch (unless I fall flat on my face, then I will take a peek (: )</div><div><br></div></div></body></html>