<div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Ryan Macnak <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:rmacnak@gmail.com" target="_blank">rmacnak@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><span class="">On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 10:38 AM, Eliot Miranda <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:eliot.miranda@gmail.com" target="_blank">eliot.miranda@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I do feel extremely frustrated that no one is taking the obvious route of making a plugin to allow the Cog VM to be used directly, gaining much higher performance and reducing the number of execution platforms we have to support.</blockquote><div><br></div></span><div>I thought there were already a few projects that attached a Squeak VM to NaCl.</div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>As I understand it, running under NaCl requires reworking the JIT and has real problems doing the self-modifying code involved in inline caches, etc. I want something that doesn't involve running under a managed run-time (the VM is a managed run-time, layering two on top of each other has always seemed like a poor choice to me). And if NaCl made it really easy to do why haven't any of these projects delivered yet?</div></div><div><br></div>-- <br><div class="gmail_signature">best,<div>Eliot</div></div>
</div></div>