If Fuel is easier to port to Spur I think it could be worth taking a look at using it for project loading instead of image segment. <div><br></div><div><br></div><div>Karl</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><br>On Thursday, August 20, 2015, David T. Lewis <<a href="mailto:lewis@mail.msen.com">lewis@mail.msen.com</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><br>
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 10:31:00PM -0300, Mariano Martinez Peck wrote:<br>
><br>
> Hi guys,<br>
><br>
> As part of my PhD thesis I did take a deep look to ImageSegment before<br>
> starting with Fuel. I wrote a journal paper about my experiments with<br>
> ImageSegment which I thinks provides quite a documentation that is not<br>
> written anywhere. Hope it helps:<br>
> <a href="http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/archives/papers/Mart11c-COMLAN-ObjectSwapping.pdf" target="_blank">http://rmod.lille.inria.fr/archives/papers/Mart11c-COMLAN-ObjectSwapping.pdf</a><br>
<br>
Hi Mariano,<br>
<br>
Thanks for the reference to your ObjectSwapping.pdf paper. I think that it<br>
provides a very helpful overview.<br>
<br>
As an aside, we hold regular meetings of the Squeak oversight board, which<br>
as you might expect sometimes diverge into discussion of technical issues of<br>
one sort or another. In discussion earlier today, Eliot referred to your Fuel<br>
implementation as "Parcels done right" and I agreed that I think it may help<br>
with implementing image segments on new image formats (Spur, 32/64 bit images).<br>
Personally, I like Fuel because it is easy to read and understand.<br>
<br>
I would encourage folks to read the ObjectSwapping paper and also to consider<br>
helping with implementation of image segments on Spur images. Mariano's paper<br>
provides good documentation on the topic.<br>
<br>
Dave<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div>