<div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-01-08 14:39 GMT+01:00 Ben Coman <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:btc@openinworld.com" target="_blank">btc@openinworld.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div id=":60u" class="a3s" style="overflow:hidden">The in-image atomicity of determining whether a signal was actually<br>
consumed or not during process suspension/termination is awkward. Its<br>
seems hard to *really* know for sure it right (but I haven't looked in<br>
depth into Denis' latest proposals.)</div></blockquote></div><br>I realize that my proposals was wrong because it is based on extra message send which can be interrupted. So I think about different solution.</div><div class="gmail_extra">Current solution which silently skip ensure block not suitable for case of ReadWriteLock where there are two semaphores inside same critical method</div></div>