<body><div id="__MailbirdStyleContent" style="font-size: 10pt;font-family: Arial;color: #000000;text-align: left" dir="ltr">
Hmm... Patrick just pointed out to me that this critique addresses Unum I. "Posits" are Unum III:<div><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unum_(number_format)"><span style="font-size: 10pt">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unum_(number_format)</span></a><br></div><div><br></div><div>Hmm...</div><div><br></div><div>Best,</div><div>Marcel</div><div class="mb_sig"></div><blockquote class='history_container' type='cite' style='border-left-style:solid;border-width:1px; margin-top:20px; margin-left:0px;padding-left:10px;'>
<p style='color: #AAAAAA; margin-top: 10px;'>Am 11.11.2022 04:34:31 schrieb Craig Latta <craig@blackpagedigital.com>:</p><div style='font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif'><br> This critique was interesting also, by William Kahan, the main <br>architect of the IEEE 754-1985 floating-point spec:<br><br> https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/UnumSORN.pdf<br><br><br>-C<br><br>--<br>Craig Latta :: research computer scientist ::<br>Black Page Digital :: Berkeley, California ::<br>663137D7940BF5C0AF :: C1349FB2ADA32C4D5314CE ::<br><br><br><br><br></div></blockquote>
</div></body>