[Webteam] No mention of Squeak relicensing to less-restrictive Apache license on Squeak.org

[Alex Perez]

Folks,

According to 
http://laptop.media.mit.edu/laptopnews.nsf/2e76a5a80bc36cbf85256cd700545fa5/fd078b45d9ffd8e7852571f9005be555?OpenDocument 
, Alan Kay announced a month and a half ago that Steve Jobs has agreed 
to relicense Squeak under the Apache License, but the license cited at

htttp://www.squeak.org/SqueakLicense/

is still the old APSL 2.0. Shouldn't this be updated to reflect the 
change, as well as the license file that comes along with the release? 
(which launches me into a question of why the 3.9 final image still 
isn't a default part of the main archives under the download section, 
but I digress, and am sure you folks are already aware of this)

Respectfully,
Alex Perez