[Webteam] Suggestion for Squeak Website

[karl]

I like it, Ken.
I will add it to the license page.
Karl

Ken Causey wrote:
> I don't think the current text
>
> "Please see http://netjam.org/squeak/contributors for current
> contributor information, as well as the contributor agreement (including
> details about where to send it)."
>
> However I think it is mistargetted.  How many people are going to be
> looking for a list of contributors?  Instead I think you should target
> anyone reading this who thinks they have contributed to Squeak and does
> not remember having sent in a signed agreement and encourage them to
> check if they have and if not then do so.  Secondarily then point out
> that if they have a moment they might want to look through the
> contributors list for anyone they know who is either not completely
> identified or who has not yet sent in their agreement.
>
> Rough attempt:
>
> "Have you contributed source to Squeak (prior to some date?)?  If you
> believe you have but have not sent in an agreement to allow your
> submission(s) to be licensed under the MIT license then please see
> http://netjam.org/squeak/contributors .  There you can find a list of
> known contributors and a PDF of the agreement with instructions.
>
> Also there are a few people for which we are lacking full contact
> information.  If you think you can help please also visit the link above
> and see if you can identify any of the unknown developer initials or any
> of the developers for whom we do not have a current email address."
>
> Ken
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 20:16 +0100, Karl wrote:
>   
>> stephane ducasse wrote:
>>     
>>> hi guys
>>>
>>> would it be possible to get the license template ***and*** the address 
>>> where to send it because this is totally not clear
>>> to me on the web site of squeak.
>>>       
>> The top paragraph on the page links to Craigs site which list all the 
>> missing contributer info and the pdf. The address to mail to is on the 
>> pdf. You have to snail mail a signed printout, as far as I know, for it 
>> to be a legally valid document.
>>
>> Anybody else find the current situation unclear and have some input ?
>>
>> karl
>> _______________________________________________
>> Webteam mailing list
>> Webteam at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
>>
>>