[Webteam] Re: Screenshots page (was squeak.org content...)

[Jason Rogers]

Well, not exactly... but it does sound intriguing.  Getting a
screenshot of an image shouldn't be that hard.  I will look into it.

On Sat, Oct 4, 2008 at 5:38 PM, Janko Mivšek <janko.mivsek at eranova.si> wrote:
> Jason Rogers wrote:
>>
>> Gallery -- great idea.  I never liked the way we did screenshots
>> originally.
>>
>> RE: the shots themselves, that's a nice point in general, but perhaps
>> we could have a ModSqueak section where users could upload shots of
>> their images to show off their style.  In order to do that right I
>> would think they would need a one-liner to describe it, and if
>> possible a script that we could download to apply the mod.  The script
>> idea wouldn't work if user-embedded images are present in the mod, but
>> I could easily see making a Monticello package or something similar
>> that would include the images so the script would work.  Probably a
>> bit grandiose of an idea...  I just don't want to totally nix the idea
>> of having user-mod'ed shots, because they tend to be really nice.
>
> So, you actually propose something like that:
>
> - you have in image a "snapshoter", which you fire and it will grab some
> window or entire image.
>
> - shot will be immediatelly sent via HTTP to your personal gallery of
> screenshots on http://www.squeak.org/Screenshots/Jason ,
>
> Ok, I a bit extended your idea but doesn't sound nice? And it isn't so hard
> to achieve. All I don't know is how to shot windows or a whole image.
>
> Janko
>
>
>
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Markus Fritsche <fritsche.markus at gmx.net>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Matthew Fulmer schrieb:
>>>
>>>>> Well we have already image support on the website but we came to the
>>>>> idea to use a Gallery scriblet for that. Here is then an example of
>>>>> such
>>>>> screenshot gallery:
>>>>>     http://demo.bioskop.fr/wiki/screenshots.html
>>>>> So, we can add few such galleries on this page, one for each section
>>>>> and
>>>>>  table of contents at the top. What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> Nice. Go for it.
>>>
>>> Here's my opinion:
>>>
>>> I'd like to have screenshots I can personally "experience myself". So I
>>> like the screenshot of Dr. Geo II, since I can download the projekt and
>>> get to the same result.
>>>
>>> I can download Squeak-2.2-mini and go to MVC.
>>>
>>> But, for instance, I can't download SMA's user interface changes and
>>> install it.
>>>
>>> Don't get me wrong, if somebody did invest 100eds of hours to change his
>>> image, that's cool. But I get frustrated if I see a "cool squeak
>>> screenshot" and there is now way to do that on my own...
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Webteam mailing list
>>> Webteam at lists.squeakfoundation.org
>>> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> --
> Janko Mivšek
> Svetovalec za informatiko
> Eranova d.o.o.
> Ljubljana, Slovenija
> www.eranova.si
> tel:  01 514 22 55
> faks: 01 514 22 56
> gsm: 031 674 565
> _______________________________________________
> Webteam mailing list
> Webteam at lists.squeakfoundation.org
> http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/webteam
>



-- 
Jason Rogers

"I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live;
yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life
which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of
the Son of God, who loved me, and gave
himself for me."
    Galatians 2:20