You have a logic issue with the first one:
sortedNotes
^notes sort:[:a :b | (a date = b date) and:[a temps > b temps]] .
This is saying that the the two dates are different, then false.  For this you probably want to be something like:
sortedNotes
^notes sort:[:a :b | a date > b date or: [(a date = b date) and:[a temps > b temps]]] .

-cbc

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Raymond Asselin <jgr.asselin@me.com> wrote:
For now I implemented:

sortedNotes
^notes sort:[:a :b | (a date = b date) and:[a temps > b temps]] .

AND

notesSorted
^notes sort:[:a :b | a date = b date
                ifTrue:[a temps > b temps]
                ifFalse:[a date > b date]] .

does exactly the same result.

But there is still notes in a same date that do not sort correctly, the begining is good and after 5 or so objects
I get some witch do not seem to be sorted.

BTW don't know the difference between sort:  and sorted:
it seems as if the last one produce a new collection and the first one produce same collection but sorted.

Note: I use 24 hours instead of a.m. / p.m. is this may cause problems?

> Le 2015-02-04 à 12:00, Paul DeBruicker <pdebruic@gmail.com> a écrit :
>
> a date = b date
>   ifTrue:[a temps > b temps]
>   ifFalse:[a date > b date]

_______________________________________________
Beginners mailing list
Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners