2008/2/25, Michael van der Gulik <mikevdg@gmail.com>:

>
>
> On 2/26/08, cdrick <cdrick65@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi

> I'm never going to advocate integrating my Namespaces implementation into
> the squeak.org image. It would be a bad idea -- squeak.org needs to remain
> compatible with the large base of code out there, and my Namespaces
> solution breaks backwards compatibility.
> Instead, I'm making a fork of Squeak called
> SecureSqueak which will use Namespaces
> extensively.

Interesting, I'll look at it for sure :) is it squeak-E ? where can we see it ?