I am not absolutely sure, but I think CUIS translates methods to native code, instead of bytecodes, thus executing faster.<div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 11:38, John Worden <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:worden.john@gmail.com">worden.john@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">Absolute beginner playing with smalltalk.  I have a simple program that opens a number of text files, plays with data closes files and gives a count of things in the files. (Its actually my Squeak version of the Cincom VW Tutorial).  I have run it on Squeak, Pharo and Cuis images. What suprised me was the difference in speeds.  I haven&#39;t done tried to time it (I should do that or at least work out how to) but Squeak and Pharo take about the same time whereas Cuis is significantly quicker. I know its a cut down image but the difference is remarkable.  Is this to be expected? <br>
<font color="#888888">
<br>John<br><br>
</font><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Beginners mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org">Beginners@lists.squeakfoundation.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners" target="_blank">http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/beginners</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>