Box-Admins April 2015

box-admins@lists.squeakfoundation.org

7 participants
7 discussions

Re: [squeak-dev] source.squeak.org seems to be asleep again
by Chris Muller 21 Apr '15

21 Apr '15

I'm running a job on box4 to load the history DB from trunk (12K mcz's). It seems we have just one cpu on box4 and this has slowed the SS image enough to cause some timeouts with clients. I have reniced my job +19, lets see if that helps.. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 8:08 PM, tim Rowledge <tim(a)rowledge.org> wrote: > http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/source.squeak.org says it’s not just me. > > tim > -- > tim Rowledge; tim(a)rowledge.org; http://www.rowledge.org/tim > Implementation is the sincerest form of flattery. > > >

1 0

Re: Squeak4.6 Squeaksource repo
by Chris Muller 20 Apr '15

20 Apr '15

Hi Tobias, only admin has access to create new projects at source.squeak.org, but I am not an admin. I have no issues if you want to redirect squeak46 to trunk temporarily. I'm also okay if we would like to go ahead and get our squeak46 repository created. Levente is the box-admins team leader, I'm cc'ing that list in case he has any input. On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 4:47 AM, Pape, Tobias <Tobias.Pape(a)hpi.de> wrote: > Hi Chris > > I got a question for you as the release manager. > Within the next days, I have to prepare a Squeak distribution > for our local lecture work. > I want to base the whole thing on the upcoming 4.6 but > for reasons, I cannot wait to prepare the image. My idea is > to start with Trunk as of today, but fix the update url of > the resulting image to that of 4.6, probably > > http://source.squeak.org/squeak46 > > . This repo does not exist yet. > Would it be possible to > a) make a temporary redirect > http://source.squeak.org/squeak46 -> http://source.squeak.org/trunk > until 4.6 is there (preferred, I could do that on the nginx site) > or > b) make an yet empty http://source.squeak.org/squeak46 ? > > Best > -Tobias > > -- > Tobias Pape > Research School on Service-Oriented Systems Engineering > Software Architecture Group | http://www.hpi.uni-potsdam.de/swa/ > > Hasso-Plattner-Institut für Softwaresystemtechnik GmbH | Universität Potsdam > Prof.-Dr.-Helmert-Str. 2-3, D-14482 Potsdam, Germany > Amtsgericht Potsdam, HRB 12184 | Geschäftsführung: Prof. Dr. Christoph Meinel >

2 1

Jenkins executors on master
by Levente Uzonyi 13 Apr '15

13 Apr '15

Hi All, I see that we have two executors on master, but the machine has only one CPU. This wouldn't be a problem in general - it possibly gives some speedup when one of the builds is waiting for some external resource - but it adds way too much noise to the SqueakTrunkPerformance job's results. The last few builds are quite okay, but previous runs look like noise only: http://build.squeak.org/job/SqueakTrunkPerformance/performance/ So, I think we should either ensure somehow that the SqueakTrunkPerformance job can only be executed alone, or just decrease the number of executors to one. Another thing which should be ensured is that this job can't be run on any of the slaves, because that makes the comparision with previous builds uncomparable. I can imagine that these are all handled already, because the last few results are pretty much consistent. In that case sorry for the noise. Levente

2 4

Seems like I broke source.squeak.org's email sending
by Levente Uzonyi 13 Apr '15

13 Apr '15

Hi All, I uploaded System-ul.721, which has a class comment with some formatting in it, and I suspect that the image can't create a diff for that. It seems like it broke the email sending, because I got no email for that commit, nor for any further commits. If you feel like you know how to quickly fix this, then please do. Otherwise I'll have to find the instructions to access the image. :) Levente

2 2

GitHub access
by Frank Shearar 06 Apr '15

06 Apr '15

This seems like the best/least inappropriate place to talk about GitHub access, so here goes. We have Owners, Core and Associate teams. Owners have full access to all repositories (currently only squeak-ci), while Core has write access... to the empty set. So since Tobias Pape's been issuing pull requests, and is in Core, he's been asking why he can't write to the repository. And as per the above, it looks like it's just "we haven't had anyone ask before, so we didn't set anything up". So I did. Core members now have write access to squeak-ci. frank

1 0

FIY: box3 library hack for SqueakSSL
by Tobias Pape 04 Apr '15

04 Apr '15

Dear Box-Admins, There's a problem on the CI Server regarding libraries. Some Jobs need SqueakSSL, which is downloaded from google code and made accessible. However, the binary is linked against OpenSSL as provided by RedHat/CentOS and the naming scheme differs to Debian/Ubuntu's: When the former uses something like libXXX.so.10, the latter uses libXXX.so.1.0.0 or so. Thus we cannot load the required libs, although installed. $ ldd ./coglinuxht/lib/squeak/4.0-3253/SqueakSSL linux-gate.so.1 => (0xf57fe000) libcrypto.so.10 => not found libssl.so.10 => not found libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb75bc000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb771a000) HENCE I mad a hack. Excerpt from the admin-log.txt: HACK: Link the existing openssl libs to CentOS names, because SqueakSSL is linked against these, not the Debian scheme: root@box3-squeak:~# cd /usr/lib root@box3-squeak:/usr/lib# ln -s libcrypto.so.0.9.8 libcrypto.so.10 root@box3-squeak:/usr/lib# ln -s libssl.so.0.9.8 libssl.so.10 This works, albeit with a warning: ldd ./coglinuxht/lib/squeak/4.0-3253/SqueakSSL ./coglinuxht/lib/squeak/4.0-3253/SqueakSSL: /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.10: version `libcrypto.so.10' not found (required by ./coglinuxht/lib/squeak/4.0-3253/SqueakSSL) ./coglinuxht/lib/squeak/4.0-3253/SqueakSSL: /usr/lib/libssl.so.10: version `libssl.so.10' not found (required by ./coglinuxht/lib/squeak/4.0-3253/SqueakSSL) linux-gate.so.1 => (0xf57fe000) libcrypto.so.10 => /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.10 (0xb765b000) libssl.so.10 => /usr/lib/libssl.so.10 (0xb760f000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0xb74c1000) libdl.so.2 => /lib/libdl.so.2 (0xb74bc000) libz.so.1 => /usr/lib/libz.so.1 (0xb74a8000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0xb77c8000) This _should_ work until we find a proper workaround, but that's a topic for squeak-dev. Best -Tobias

3 2

Upgrading jenkins; any counterpoints?
by Tobias Pape 02 Apr '15

02 Apr '15

Hi all I thought about upgrading jenkins, especially for [security reasons](https://jenkins-ci.org/changelog) (more than 20 fixes). Also, I'd like to install the nice [doony theme](https://github.com/kevinburke/doony). Does anybody has a reason I should not attempt this? Best -Tobias

3 2

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

Box-Admins April 2015