On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Bert Freudenberg
<bert@freudenbergs.de> wrote:
Why wouldn't this fit into Trunk?
Well, that would have been my preference too except that I thought that trunk was only for stuff that was in the base.
I was about to propose a "contrib" project where such packages could live. But then I thought the rules would have to be pretty much the same as for the trunk repo, except the packages wouldn't be loaded by default.
I think that's better.
Worth discussing on squeak-dev?
Sure, but if I were you and I could I'd just create contrib and be done. We'd need to advertise it to newbies, which I guess would mean updating the New Community Development Model manifesto. The front page of
source.squeak.org might ask one to read it instead of just suggesting.
- Bert -
Hi All,
I was playing around with Josh Gargus' port of Cassowary and exhumed my TempScopeEditor which edits methods to move method-level temps into their smallest enclosing block scope. I realise it is generally useful and is better as a stand-alone package than as part of Cog, where it is dependent on VMMaker. I'd like it to live on source.squeak.org and Id like the project to be called TemporaryVariableScopeEditor.
AdvThanksance
--
best,Eliot