With the plethora of Squeak images, versions, builds, whatever, I'm a little confused as to picking the best environment. Currently I've been working in the 3.9-8 VM with the 3.9-final-7067 image, but some things don't seem to work right.
-- Tim
What's not working?
Ron
-----Original Message----- From: cryptography-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:cryptography-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Cerebus Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 12:04 PM To: Cryptography Team Development List Subject: [Cryptography Team] Developing in what image/version/build?
With the plethora of Squeak images, versions, builds, whatever, I'm a little confused as to picking the best environment. Currently I've been working in the 3.9-8 VM with the 3.9-final-7067 image, but some things don't seem to work right.
-- Tim _______________________________________________ Cryptography mailing list Cryptography@lists.squeakfoundation.org http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cryptography
On 11/27/06, Ron Teitelbaum Ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
What's not working?
For one thing, in some combinations of VM & image Monticello won't see the Crypto-Config mcz. In others, MC will see it but it won't load it (I can try to reproduce when I get home).
Plus I'm just generally confused about the whole package/changeset/save your project on a server thing.
I've also toyed with the Tweak/iSqueak image (which makes more sense to me than Morphic, I'm sorry to say) and the Croquet image (which seems to be having issues with OpenGL initialization on my Mac), but it's not clear to me how close to the mainline Squeak I should stick. Or if indeed there *is* a mainline Squeak. :)
There's a lot to wrap one's mind around when coming from first principles, and picking a development mode & environment is a big one.
-- Tim
Hi Tim,
-----Original Message----- From: Cerebus Sent: Monday, November 27, 2006 5:22 PM
On 11/27/06, Ron Teitelbaum Ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
What's not working?
For one thing, in some combinations of VM & image Monticello won't see the Crypto-Config mcz. In others, MC will see it but it won't load it (I can try to reproduce when I get home).
You need to load my patch to get Monticello Configurations to work: http://bugs.impara.de/view.php?id=5217
Plus I'm just generally confused about the whole package/changeset/save your project on a server thing.
Go signup at www.squeakSource.com I'll add you as a developer. The right way to go here is using Monticello. Getting up to speed is pretty easy. http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/43 .
The easiest thing is to just save your changes into our repository. You can also save you code until you are ready in your package-cache or in a separate directory. I run my own squeakSource image to manage my changes.
I've also toyed with the Tweak/iSqueak image (which makes more sense to me than Morphic, I'm sorry to say) and the Croquet image (which seems to be having issues with OpenGL initialization on my Mac), but it's not clear to me how close to the mainline Squeak I should stick. Or if indeed there *is* a mainline Squeak. :)
I'm using a 3.9 image. That's where most of the latest crypto work has been done. I suggest you sick with that for now.
There's a lot to wrap one's mind around when coming from first principles, and picking a development mode & environment is a big one.
Yeah, but you are catching on fast!!
Ron
On 11/27/06, Ron Teitelbaum Ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
Go signup at www.squeakSource.com I'll add you as a developer. The right way to go here is using Monticello. Getting up to speed is pretty easy. http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/43 .
Just FYI, I'm waiting for clearance from my employer. Since this stuff is pretty close to what I'm paid to do, I figured better safe than sorry. I don't expect a problem from them; this is one of the advantages of working for a not-for-profit.
-- Tim
That's a very good idea!
Ron
-----Original Message----- From: Cerebus [mailto:cerebus2@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, December 03, 2006 12:33 PM To: Ron@usmedrec.com; Cryptography Team Development List Subject: Re: RE: [Cryptography Team] Developing in what image/version/build?
On 11/27/06, Ron Teitelbaum Ron@usmedrec.com wrote:
Go signup at www.squeakSource.com I'll add you as a developer. The
right
way to go here is using Monticello. Getting up to speed is pretty easy. http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/43 .
Just FYI, I'm waiting for clearance from my employer. Since this stuff is pretty close to what I'm paid to do, I figured better safe than sorry. I don't expect a problem from them; this is one of the advantages of working for a not-for-profit.
-- Tim
Hi,
Would it be easier if we work with the StrongTalk VM and embed primitives that will enable us certification ? If we conclude that the general VM will have difficulties to pass certification, may be, what we need is a VM that is certified, which has minimum mods. In which case, StrongTalk might be a good place to start. Thoughts ?
Cheers <k/>
cryptography@lists.squeakfoundation.org
-
Cerebus -
Krishna Sankar -
Ron Teitelbaum