Ok,
So i published a update to the update stream.
To test you can grab latest image and update.
http://etoys.squeak.org/download/Etoys-To-Go-5.0.1-RC4.zip

I'll soon start to look at the next part of the release process.

Cheers,
Karl




On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 2:40 PM, karl ramberg <karlramberg@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,
There is a update called update-bf.31.mcm.mcm in the repository.

I guess we should delete that

Cheers,
Karl


On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert@freudenbergs.de> wrote:
(moving to etoys-dev)

Awesome! :)

- Bert -

On 22.01.2014, at 20:49, karl ramberg <karlramberg@gmail.com> wrote:




On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert@freudenbergs.de> wrote:
Karl: do you want to take a stab at doing an Etoys release? I don't have the time to actually do it, but I am willing to do some hand-holding :)

I will try. Must read up on this stuff, because it is easy to mess up.

I think I will start by collecting the changes since last release.

Hand holding and maybe some help with passwords is needed.
I have changed computers a few times and I'm not sure I the subversion password.

Cheers,
Karl

- Bert -

On 21.01.2014, at 21:52, karl ramberg <karlramberg@gmail.com> wrote:

We have release process but it's a little complicated.

Karl


On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Gustavo Duarte <gduarte@activitycentral.com> wrote:
Bert,

I saw the commit to fix the sugar interaction was done.

To generate the deb package of Etoys with the last changes, without wait for the upsream release: It is right the following procedure ?:

1) Run Etoys, and from unnamed project, update from server code.
2) Save the changes
3) Copy etoys.image and etoys.changes to my source code tree
4) Generate the deb package.


My doubt, is meanly if only etoys.image and etoys.changes are needed to copy ?


Thanks.
Gustavo.




On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Gustavo Duarte <gduarte@activitycentral.com> wrote:
Bert, thank a ton for the fix.

I added the bug to the tracker and upload the fix.


I gonna wait, to be included on upstream.

I hope procedure followed was be right.

Thanks.
Gustavo


On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Bert Freudenberg <bert@freudenbergs.de> wrote:
Hi Gustavo,

the problem is not in the XMLDomParser, but how it it used. Apparently the way gconf stores its values changed. Previously both numeric and string values had a separate entity inside, like you discovered. Now it appears int values are stored in a more compact way.

The problem is in the SugarLauncher>>gconfPropertiesAt: method. It treats strings and int properties the same way. 

Instead of "entry elements first contentString" it might use "entry attributeAt: 'value' ifAbsent: [entry elements first contentString]". This should work with both the old and the new format. Here's the full method, patched (but untested):

gconfPropertiesAt: aString
| dir |
"search up tree to guess home dir"
dir := Project squeakletDirectory.
[dir pathName = '/'] whileFalse: [
dir := dir containingDirectory.
[FileStream
readOnlyFileNamed: dir pathName, '/.gconf', aString, '/%gconf.xml'
do: [:f |
| props |
props := Dictionary new.
(XMLDOMParser parseDocumentFrom: f)
tagsNamed: #entry do: [:entry |
props at: (entry attributeAt: 'name')
put: (entry attributeAt: 'value'
ifAbsent: [entry elements first contentString])].
^props].
] on: FileDoesNotExistException do: [:ignore | ].
].
^self error: 'cannot find gconf path ', aString

This document describes how to publish a fix for Etoys:


If you just want to fix it in the distro rather than waiting for an upstream release, you should be able to change the method, enter the hidden unnamed top-level project, and save the image from that project (it is important to be in that project when saving the image).

- Bert -

On 16.01.2014, at 15:54, Gustavo Duarte <gduarte@activitycentral.com> wrote:

Hi Georg,

The xml file content is:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<gconf>
        <entry name="color" mtime="1389708067" type="string">
                <stringvalue>#9A5200,#FF2B34</stringvalue>
        </entry>

        <entry name="birth_timestamp" mtime="1389708044" type="int" value="-849347955"/>

        <entry name="ip" mtime="1389708044" type="string">
                <stringvalue>1.2.3.4</stringvalue>
        </entry>

        <entry name="SugarBuddyOwner" mtime="1389708044" type="string">
                <stringvalue>1234</stringvalue>
        </entry>

        <entry name="nick" mtime="1389708044" type="string">
                <stringvalue>estudiante</stringvalue>
        </entry>
</gconf>

I don't know much about xml format, but seemingly it hasn't XML schema specification, right ? 


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Georg Gollmann <gollmann@zid.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:

Am 16.01.2014 um 13:10 schrieb Gustavo Duarte <gduarte@activitycentral.com>:

I guess that XMLDOMParser doesn't support the xml line format: 
<entry name="birth_timestamp" mtime="1389708044" type="int" value="-849347955"/>.

I don't know much about xml format, but i think that is valid format entry, so XMLDOMParser has bug.

Whether the bug is in the parser or the file depends on the XML schema specified in the file.

Kind regards
Georg




- Bert -


_______________________________________________
etoys-dev mailing list
etoys-dev@squeakland.org
http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev