I think we have an important bug regarding the information we convey for third party Deb or Rpm packagers.
As I reported months ago, the Squeakland download page is very far to be perfect for a free software packager because it brings *no* information about the source code. As you may know, each binary package comes with its source package.
As it is now, it is not clear at all for a thrird party packager where are the sources.
For an external viewer, it looks like Etoys pretend to be free software but it is not (source code not there) or it looks like someone want to protect some asset (Is it a post Sophie trauma?)
I wrote a proposal (far to be perfect) for the download page, but Tim removed it because of translation issue in the seb server, which I agree because the way it was rendered was far to be perfect)
While writing the proposal, I also received unfriendly feedback from Berg for tiny details.
Guys, do you have any problem providing information about the source code?
It is a tiny effort to clarify this situation.