A distinct package name would be nice
I got confuced when Morphic package got changed

EtoysUserScripts would be quite descriptive
 
Karl
 
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Bert Freudenberg <bert@freudenbergs.de> wrote:
We might also want to change the category for Kedama players.

declareAndPossiblyRename: only checks for #Player as superclass name. Since Kedama uses a different Player class, this falls back to the 'Morphic-Imported' category. At least that's what I think is happening.

IMHO we should change those categories to not collide with the MC package names. Either put everything into "Object categoryForUniclasses", or have multiple categories as previously, but use a distinct name. E.g. 'UserObjects-Morphic', 'UserObjects-Etoys', 'UserObjects-Balloon3D'.

Opinions?

- Bert -

On 27.05.2011, at 00:38, karl ramberg wrote:

> Found it:
> ReleaseBuilder new cleanUpEtoys
>
> Karl
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 12:36 AM, karl ramberg <karlramberg@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a issue with Monticello and Kedama.
>> I updated project Particle dye in water, but noticed that this adds Kedama players in a category: 'Morphic-Imported'
>>
>> Should I just ignore this ?
>>
>> I'm not quite sure how to fix it...
>>
>> Karl
>>
>
_______________________________________________
etoys-dev mailing list
etoys-dev@squeakland.org
http://lists.squeakland.org/mailman/listinfo/etoys-dev