Yes, good point. I've put it on the agenda for the board meeting:
http://squeakboard.wordpress.com/2009/04/22/initial-agenda-for-may-7th-2009/
Cheers, - Andreas
John M McIntosh wrote:
I note if you go to the squeak.org website and tap but report it dumps you into Mantis. However for novices that likely isn't helpful and the link to a mail message from Feb isn't something anyone is going to find, or mmm or remember.
On 5-May-09, at 9:05 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
I'll check it out. Also note that cc-ing release@lists.squeakfoundation.org will generally be useful.
Cheers,
- Andreas
John M McIntosh wrote:
Well then for http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=6581 who would stick that into 3.11? Let alone that I'm looking at 3.10.2 image Added (partly) http://bugs.squeak.org/view.php?id=7348 On 5-May-09, at 2:07 AM, Andreas Raab wrote:
Hi John -
John M McIntosh wrote:
(I had to fix the sq 3.10.2 image because of ignored bug using allInstances I reported years back, never fixed, but fixed in pharo last fall).
[... snip ...]
(to be fair here I could bring some fixes into the 3.10.2 image to reduce the cpu time, but really those fixes should have gone in years ago...)
Just as an FYI, there is now a well-defined process for contributing stuff to 3.11:
http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2009-February/134095....
If these fixes are on Mantis all you need is to provide an installer script and update its status accordingly. Just try it!
Cheers,
- Andreas
--
John M. McIntosh johnmci@smalltalkconsulting.com Twitter: squeaker68882 Corporate Smalltalk Consulting Ltd. http://www.smalltalkconsulting.com ===========================================================================
release@lists.squeakfoundation.org