On 19.07.2015, at 18:34, Chris Muller <asqueaker@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Fabio, say, which platform did you test on?  Hm, something
> interesting -- that new SqueakSSL (for Linux) is 7 MB where the one I
> have been using is only 27K, which easily makes it the largest plugin
> and would slightly inflate teh size of the All-In-One.
>
> Why is it so much bigger, is it compiled with debug information or something?

No, I statically linked against LibreSSL.

Best regards
        -Tobias

>
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 3:56 AM, Fabio Niephaus <lists@fniephaus.com> wrote:
>> + 1 for releasing 4.6 and handling problems as users find them :)
>>
>> But there's one problem that I just found: try and run the following and you
>> should get a SqueakSSL error (-5):
>>
>> (WebClient new httpGet:
>> 'https://api.travis-ci.org/repos/squeak-smalltalk/squeak.org/builds')
>> content
>>
>> Looks like we forgot to update the SqueakSSL plugins with the ones from [1]?
>> After doing that manually, the above works just fine...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Fabio
>>
>> [1] https://github.com/itsmeront/squeakssl/releases
>>
>> --
>>
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 11:06 PM Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Chris Muller <ma.chris.m@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There was 1 vote for including the legacy Mac plugins and 0 against.
>>>> So Craig and I made one last All-in-One and its uploaded.
>>>>
>>>> So, I think can we call 4.6 "done" then?
>>>
>>>
>>> Do we have any volunteers to do some shake down tests?  dare we do some
>>> shake down tests?  SHould we instead release and handle problems as users
>>> find them?  Chris, have you run your test suite using the 4.6 yet?
>>>
>>> --
>>> _,,,^..^,,,_
>>> best, Eliot