Hi Peter,

we did a MSIL to C++ backend in our LSW DotNet Reflection-Browser some years back. It avoided the need of C++ parser because we decompiled MSIL..

Just curious what it is for ? we introduced Smalltalk deompiler backend just to increase readability of .NET code for Smalltalkers.

Frank

---

From: squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org [mailto:squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org] On Behalf Of Peter William Lount
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:40 PM
To: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Subject: Re: [squeak-dev] C++ parser in Smalltalk?

 
<peter@smalltalk.org> wrote:
 

C/C++ to Smalltalk translator anyone?
 

 
multiple inheritance, anyone? ;-)
 
Have fun,
 
Michael
 
 
 

hi,

Taking back the base technologies into the fold of Smalltalk Style Systems.

Smalltalk and C were both designed with operating systems in mind.

Unix had the prevailing popular OS design.

Smalltalk Style Systems have the prevailing superior Messaging-Objects design.

Absorb and transform ALL C/C++ code into something new jettisoning the current bases in C/C++ with transformations into Smalltalk Style Systems.

Be license aware and appropriate of course.

Just a thought.

Now to try some cool visualizations of large C++ ick. Shivers.

Cheers,

Peter