Hi Christoph --

The one from archive.org has a pretty good resolution of 2387x3211. I bumped it up 200% and cleaned it a little bit.

Here are both versions:

https://1drv.ms/u/s!Ao581IY5DvIQi5Uf3W-chiv1VJ_b8g?e=AfurJT

Best,

Marcel

Am 18.12.2022 21:18:17 schrieb Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com>:

Hi Christoph,

On Dec 18, 2022, at 11:12 AM, Thiede, Christoph <Christoph.Thiede@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de> wrote:

So no one has got a perfect magazine and scanner? Then I will try my luck with some upscaling algorithms. Anyway, thank you! :-)

You (presume you) don’t want to scan the cover itself. Tinned produced the image as a print, of which he made 150 copies. The cover was derived from the print, but overlaid with the Byte logo, issue number, date of publication and summary of contents. Find an original print and scan that. It will give you far superior results.

Best,

Christoph

Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von David T. Lewis <lewis@mail.msen.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 16. Dezember 2022 03:26:36
An: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Betreff: Re: [squeak-dev] Smalltalk Byte Magazine Cover searched

On Thu, Dec 15, 2022 at 05:40:49PM -0800, tim Rowledge wrote:
>
>
> > On 2022-12-15, at 2:37 PM, Eliot Miranda <eliot.miranda@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Then please do a higher resolution scan, and upload, eg to google drive.
>
> T'would be better if someone that has a copy which has been kept in storage did that; mine is in good condition but
> a) has been out in the light for 25+ years
> b) has some signatures invading the artwork.
>

Mine was lost in a house move years ago. Hard to believe that anyone
would get rid of a perfectly good used magazine from the 1980s but
apparently these things happen. What was I thinking?

Dave