On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Keith Hodges <keith_hodges@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

Bert Freudenberg wrote:
>
> On 02.09.2009, at 09:33, Damien Cassou wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Michael van der
>> Gulik<mikevdg@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Would it perhaps be better to have the automated trunk commit
>>> messages going
>>> to some other dedicated mailing list?

Which we already have.

>> With squeaksource, it is easy to get an RSS feed of a package. That
>> way only people interested get noticed.
>
>
> Why would people on squeak-dev not be interested in Squeak development?

1. Not having time.

2. Poluting the exisiting actual human messages with extra stuff to
trawl through when you are searching for something.

95% of the human messages end up in my trash unread. I'm finding about the same proportion of commit messages are relevant to me as human messages.

I'm becoming a bit of a fan of the commit messages. You can see what's happening, and it's the best forum for discussing changes.