Hi Marcel,


why do we need a redundant #initialize method for this? Wouldn't it have been enough to trigger #recreateSpecialObjectsArray in a postscript? Duplication hurts :-)


Best,

Christoph

Von: Squeak-dev <squeak-dev-bounces@lists.squeakfoundation.org> im Auftrag von commits@source.squeak.org <commits@source.squeak.org>
Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. März 2021 11:40:22
An: squeak-dev@lists.squeakfoundation.org; packages@lists.squeakfoundation.org
Betreff: [squeak-dev] The Trunk: Kernel-mt.1380.mcz
 
Marcel Taeumel uploaded a new version of Kernel to project The Trunk:
http://source.squeak.org/trunk/Kernel-mt.1380.mcz

==================== Summary ====================

Name: Kernel-mt.1380
Author: mt
Time: 9 March 2021, 11:40:18.855529 am
UUID: cef64cd0-d892-584e-8bce-6f5dac0202fc
Ancestors: Kernel-eem.1379

Make sure that special object no. 38 is FullBlockClosure.

See discussion at http://forum.world.st/Smalltalk-specialObjectsArray-at-38-tp5125148p5125164.html

=============== Diff against Kernel-eem.1379 ===============

Item was added:
+ ----- Method: FullBlockClosure class>>initialize (in category 'class initialization') -----
+ initialize
+        "Also see SmalltalkImage >> #recreateSpecialObjectsArray."
+       
+        (Smalltalk specialObjectsArray at: 38)
+                ifNil: [Smalltalk specialObjectsArray at: 38 put: self].!