Hi Dave,
I am sorry for the confusion. It took me some time to finally find the right thread, but apparently, Nicolas already has merged this changeset last May via Compiler-nice.430. (Thank you, Nicolas!) Because the thread when I mentioned it here ended with Marcel's advice to merge the changeset later, I had assumed that it would still be to do.
I could now, once again, point to the advantages of a GitHub-like issue and PR tracker where you could close and auto-reference threads from each other, but I guess I have already done this often enough. :-) Maybe it would be a good idea to (manually) send a short confirmation message directly to the thread where a changeset has been posted when someone finds the time to merge it. For inbox versions, this process is easier because they are arranged in Monticello with a clear identifier ...
Again, sorry for wasting your time! Nevertheless, your thoughts on #caseError: (with argument) and my #allLiterals observation are highly welcome. :-)
> I should note that it took me quite some time to figure out the context of this message.
I have no clue why the Nabble link does not point to the exact conversation. Usually, it does as far as I know. I also think it would be an improvement if replies that are sent via Nabble would have attached the entire conversation. Are we in control of the Nabble sources to make such a change?
Best,
Christoph