Thanks for clarifying. I was indeed using the 'tell all siblings', as is
commonly the case. Therefore, I will look forward to the next version!
--Randy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masashi Umezawa [mailto:umejava@mars.dti.ne.jp]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2005 9:40 PM
> To: Randy Heiland; squeakland(a)squeakland.org
> Subject: Re: [Squeakland] NetMorph and siblings
>
> Hello,
>
> NetMorph basically supports siblings.
>
> In a simple case like this, it works with no problems:
>
> 1: draw a sketch
> 2: attach a warpable script to the morph (by guruguru warp menu)
> 3: make siblings by the duplicate handle (with shift-down)
> 4: drag morphs to the adjoining edge of the desktop
> 5: siblings go to the remote desktop.
>
> However, currently NetMorph catch sibling relationship in a local machine
> only (as a normal e-toy image).
>
> So, if you try to start a distributed morphs' script by using 'start all'
> or 'tell all siblings', only local sibling morphs can start the script.
> Remote siblings never receive the request.
>
> I think NetMorph should search for siblings not only local image but also
> all connected images. This will be supported in the next version.
>
> Best regards,
>
> P.S. I'll attend C5 and perform a NetMorph demo.
>
> "Randy Heiland" <heiland(a)indiana.edu> wrote:
> > I finally got around to downloading/playing with NetMorph. Maybe I'll
> > eventually post a web page of some of my initial experiments, but one
> thing
> > I was hoping is that it would allow for siblings. However, it doesn't
> seem
> > to handle siblings - e.g., when the main sketch enters an adjoining
> > computer, but its siblings remain behind. Can someone confirm/clarify
> this?
> >
> > Thanks, Randy
> >
> ---
> [:masashi | ^umezawa]