Assessment is a tough problem. I share the frustrations with the current
forms of assessment (especially in Math) that others have expressed. While I
am constantly assessing while teaching (as I am sure you are too) it is not
in a way that produces evidence that could be used to facilitate appropriate
comparisons.
While I have many problems with assessment, I fear "its the worst form of
figuring out what works, except for all the others"
The problem, to quote Peter Drucker "if you can't measure it, you can't
manage it"
Society (ie: people, parents, politicians, school board members, even
teachers) need to have a way of knowing how well their kids are learning and
I would argue that they are right to demand it. The challenge for educators
(and it is in no way an easy one, otherwise it would have been solved
already) is to come up with an appropriate way to measure.
The folks at CRESST (well actually I only know of the work I saw by Greg
Chung, which I saw at G4L, the following is my limited understanding of what
they are trying to do) have a potentially interesting approach where they
set up environments (where they design in from the beginning methods of
assessment) that records "events" (actions taken by the kids within a given
"micro-world") then use those events to analyze understanding and what works
and what doesn't work.
I would expect in the future they will take those events in real time,
analyze them and provide feedback to the micro-world (thus to the user) to
facilitate a customized learning environment (like customized search) based
on what works (and yes what works can differ, just as customized search
differs).
Stephen
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 1:04 AM, Avigail Snir <avigail(a)snir.org> wrote:
> And we can probably repeat word by word when speaking about current and
> future attempts to introduce Etoys into school life.
>
> I wish our society will not be as obsessed about standard measuring as a
> way to define accountability and evaluate achievements. I feel it is
> counterproductive.
>
>
>
> *From:* stevesargon(a)gmail.com [mailto:stevesargon@gmail.com] *On Behalf Of
> *Steve Thomas
> *Sent:* Sunday, May 30, 2010 11:56 PM
> *To:* Avigail Snir
> *Subject:* Re: FW: also this article
>
>
>
> Thanks. I agree with the one comment in the article you attached:
>
> "the problem of training teachers in new mathematics topics and new
> pedagogic approaches was never solved, especially for the large contingent
> of teachers in elementary grades"
>
>
>
> The other hard challenge is figuring out how to do good assessment.
> Especially doing it in a way that has a realistic chance of being used given
> time and cost constraints.
>
>
>
> Stephen
>