Hi Tobias,

On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 4:47 PM, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux@gmx.de> wrote:


> On 07.07.2017, at 01:14, Holger Freyther <holger@freyther.de> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On 7. Jul 2017, at 01:13, Tobias Pape <Das.Linux@gmx.de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Wanted to produce a new 'fat' SqueakSSL binary that's guaranteed to run on both
>> CentOS-like and Debian-like. But no, libtool messes up my linker command line.
>> A bug known since 2006[1]. So, no new SqueakSSL with host name verification for you today…
>
> Did you try make configure in the unix directory to generate a newer configure/

yes, no change.

I'd really like to see the linux builds take the same approach as the Mac OS X and WIN32/WIN64 builds, just using makefiles and relegating the configure step to create a config.h defining the platform's facilities.  Then you ow;don't be dependent on libel.  Do you have any energy to take this approach?  It would take a few days, but it would be great to say goodbye to the current unix/linux build system.

_,,,^..^,,,_
best, Eliot