You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
The discussion on vm-dev shows that this tries to solve a problem which rather is at image side in latest Pharo.
See http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2018-March/027341.html
and that we should aim at simplifying the implementation rather than complexifying
See http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/vm-dev/2018-March/027343.html
About the simplification, wasn't there another effort to remove the cached file size?
And excuse the naive question, but why feof() would not work for all cases?
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.